Skip to main content
Were Police Undergunned w/ 38 Revolvers? S&W K-38 25-Round Real CCW Test (Part 2) Lionquest Fitness

Were Police Undergunned w/ 38 Revolvers? S&W K-38 25-Round Real CCW Test (Part 2) Lionquest Fitness

From Daniel Theodore

October 30, 2026

Were Police Undergunned With .38 Revolvers? S&W K-38 25-Round Real CCW Test (Part 2) Lionquest Fitness! Greg wanted to see my test with this in my Study w results day after Christmas Educational engineering evaluation and consumer product safety review tracking factory-standard, archival metal-frame platforms on a safe, closed professional range under professional supervision. Complies fully with advertiser-friendly guidelines; no assembly, modification, or high-risk behavior shown.

As a security operator and combatives instructor (MMA, BJJ, Catch Wrestling), analyzing historical small-arms development, mechanical lockwork evolution, and historical police operational standards is critical for occupational safety. Today we log Part 2 of our 25-Round Realistic Defensive Revolver CCW Test, putting the iconic 4-inch Smith & Wesson K-38 Masterpiece (Pre-Model 14) through its paces while addressing a classic debate: Were 20th-century police officers truly "undergunned" carrying 6-shot .38 Special K-frames? We evaluate rapid reloading mechanics, double-action trigger staging, sight acquisition, and precision placement across the remaining stages of this high-standards operational course. Standardized technical review format inspired by Nightwood Guns, Administrative Results, Honest Outlaw, and Garand Thumb.

🔗 LINKS:
• Combatives Instructional on BJJ Fanatics: https://bjjfanatics.com/products/combatives-and-street-jiu-jitsu-by-dan-the-wolf-man-theodore
• Paul Harrell Tribute Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7qswgk7GE8W_KWEBH6lCTI2EMh0G93G7

🤝 COMMUNITY & RESEARCH PEERS:
@hrfunk @NightwoodGuns @spnfirearms @GideonOptics2023 @Tulster @XSSights @TargetsOnline @LionquestFitness @ForgottenWeapons

📄 TESTING ANALYSIS:
Evaluating the mechanical physics, historical duty standards, and human-interface control of the S&W K-38 platform:

• Ergonomics: Analyzing the long-stroke double-action trigger reach, frame leverage, and square-butt target grip interface during high-tempo defensive course sequences.
• Texture: Documenting how vintage hand-checkered target wood grips manage frame torque and prevent hand-shift during continuous double-action strings.
• Handling: Evaluating 4-inch frame balance, sight alignment recovery, and presentation timing out of operational concealed setups (such as Tulster gear).
• Recovery & Return: Tracking frame torque and sight picture recovery—from factory micrometer target irons to modern profiles—measuring return-to-zero tracking speed on steel and paper targets provided by TargetsOnline.

Disclaimer: Educational review tracking factory specifications on a safe facility under supervision. No items altered, customized, showcased for sale, or distributed. All components are standard factory options.

📊 METRICS EVALUATED:
• Standard Range Cycles: Tracking course score completion, split times, and double-action cycling reliability across standard .38 Special loads.
• Structural Recovery: Measuring felt recoil impulse, muzzle climb, and hand-fitted lockwork smoothness across full-sized target steel frames.
• Cost vs. Performance: Verifying historical law enforcement capability, mechanical safety margins, and modern defensive viability for 4-inch .38 revolvers. @LionquestFitness @hrfunk @GunSam

👇 Comment below: Do you think 20th-century law enforcement officers were genuinely undergunned with 4-inch .38 K-frames, or was it primarily a marksmanship and training gap? Let's talk metrics!

📊 SEARCH INDEX:
Were police officers undergunned with 38 special revolvers
Smith and Wesson K-38 Masterpiece 25 round CCW test Part 2
Historical law enforcement 38 special revolver performance
Ergonomic layout analysis and double action trigger mechanics
Equipment transition handling and sight recovery timing

Report an Issue

Found outdated information, a broken link, or incorrect data? Let us know and we'll fix it.

0 characters (minimum 10)

We'll use this to follow up if needed

It's a mess, I know.

My goal is to build the most comprehensive BJJ encyclopedia anywhere — but good, accurate data is genuinely hard to come by. Records, gyms, belts and nationalities are pieced together from public and community sources, so some of it is incomplete, outdated, or flat-out wrong.

That's where you come in. If you spot something off, tell me and I'll fix it — every correction makes this better for everyone. This website wouldn't be possible without the community.